Symlink

為什麼 udev 連接兩個符號連結?

  • April 17, 2019

我的發行版是 SLES 12 SP 2。

我現在使用 DRBD(分佈式複制塊設備)。下面是一個 drbd 資源的配置範例。

resource HA1dat {
 device /dev/drbd1;
 disk /dev/mqdat/HA1;
 meta-disk internal;
 on srv0 {
   address 192.168.174.10:7000;
   node-id 0;
 }
 on srv1 {
   address 192.168.174.11:7000;
   node-id 1;
 }
 on srv9 {
   address 192.168.174.19:7000;
   node-id 2;
 }
 connection-mesh {
   hosts srv0 srv1 srv9;
 }
}

將此資源啟動為 drbd 設備後,通常會創建以下對象。

brw-rw---- 1 root disk 147, 1 Feb 13 19:41 /dev/drbd1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Feb 13 19:41 /dev/drbd/by-res/HA1dat/0 -> ../../../drbd1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Feb 13 19:41 /dev/drbd/by-disk/mqdat/HA1 -> ../../../drbd1

這些是塊設備本身和指向它的兩個符號連結。

這是正確的行為!

在其他一些伺服器(相同的分佈)上,行為是不同的。drbd 資源的配置非常相似。

resource LN0N001Edat {
 device /dev/drbd1;
 disk /dev/data1vg/LN0N001E_lv;
 meta-disk internal;
 on sedcmmwd0030 {
   address xxx.yyy.zzz.83:7000;
   node-id 0;
 }
 on sedcmmwd0040 {
   address xxx.yyy.zzz.99:7000;
   node-id 1;
 }
 on sedcmmwd0050 {
   address xxx.yyy.zzz.100:7000;
   node-id 2;
 }
 connection-mesh {
   hosts sedcmmwd0030 sedcmmwd0040 sedcmmwd0050;
 }
}

啟動此資源後,僅創建塊設備和一個連結。

brw-rw---- 1 root disk 147, 1 Mar 2 09:49 /dev/drbd1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 23 Mar 2 09:49 /dev/drbd/by-res/LN0N001Edat/0_drbd/by-disk/data1vg/LN0N001E_lv -> ../../../../../../drbd1

這就是問題!此連結是兩個預期連結的串聯。我不知道,為什麼它們被連接起來。

該連結由 udev 創建。以下輸出顯示了 udev 在這些節點上所做的差異。

行為正確的伺服器

juser@srv0:~> udevadm info /dev/drbd1
P: /devices/virtual/block/drbd1
N: drbd1
S: drbd/by-disk/mqdat/HA1
S: drbd/by-res/HA1dat/0
E: DEVICE=drbd1
E: DEVLINKS=/dev/drbd/by-res/HA1dat/0 /dev/drbd/by-disk/mqdat/HA1
E: DEVNAME=/dev/drbd1
E: DEVPATH=/devices/virtual/block/drbd1
E: DEVTYPE=disk
E: MAJOR=147
E: MINOR=1
E: SUBSYSTEM=block
E: SYMLINK=drbd/by-res/HA1dat/0 drbd/by-disk/mqdat/HA1
E: TAGS=:systemd:
E: USEC_INITIALIZED=12263844870

有問題的伺服器

root@sedcmmwd0030:/root : udevadm info /dev/drbd1
P: /devices/virtual/block/drbd1
N: drbd1
S: drbd/by-res/LN0N001Edat/0_drbd/by-disk/data1vg/LN0N001E_lv
E: DEVICE=drbd1
E: DEVLINKS=/dev/drbd/by-res/LN0N001Edat/0_drbd/by-disk/data1vg/LN0N001E_lv
E: DEVNAME=/dev/drbd1
E: DEVPATH=/devices/virtual/block/drbd1
E: DEVTYPE=disk
E: MAJOR=147
E: MINOR=1
E: SUBSYSTEM=block
E: SYMLINK=drbd/by-res/LN0N001Edat/0 drbd/by-disk/data1vg/LN0N001E_lv
E: TAGS=:systemd:
E: USEC_INITIALIZED=1212108486973

SYMLINK 行仍然是正確的。差異從 DEVLINKS 行開始。

在這兩種情況下,drbd 的規則是相同的 cat /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/65-drbd.rules # 此文件包含創建命名 DRBD 設備的規則。

SUBSYSTEM!="block", GOTO="drbd_end"
KERNEL!="drbd*", GOTO="drbd_end"

IMPORT{program}="/sbin/drbdadm sh-udev minor-%m"

# Use symlink from the environment if available
ENV{SYMLINK}!="", SYMLINK="$env{SYMLINK}", GOTO="have_symlink"

# Legacy rules for older DRBD 8.3 & 8.4 when drbdadm sh-udev did not yet export SYMLINK
ENV{DISK}!="", SYMLINK+="drbd/by-disk/$env{DISK}"
ENV{RESOURCE}!="", SYMLINK+="drbd/by-res/$env{RESOURCE}"

LABEL="have_symlink"

ENV{DEVICE}=="drbd_?*", SYMLINK+="$env{DEVICE}"

LABEL="drbd_end"

有人對錯誤連結的創建有解釋嗎?

DRBD 的 udev 規則來自 drbd-utils。您安裝了哪個版本的 DRBD 實用程序?

最新版本 9.2.2 包含附加規則以及來自開發人員的評論,看起來它可能會解決您的問題:

# This file contains the rules to create named DRBD devices.

SUBSYSTEM!="block", GOTO="drbd_end"
KERNEL!="drbd*", GOTO="drbd_end"

IMPORT{program}="@sbindir@/drbdadm sh-udev minor-%m"

# Use symlink from the environment if available
# some udev version thought it was a good idea to change a long established
# default of string_escape=none to string_escape=replace :-/
# therefore, recent enough drbdadm will no longer export space separated lists.
ENV{SYMLINK_BY_DISK}!="", SYMLINK+="$env{SYMLINK_BY_DISK}"
ENV{SYMLINK_BY_RES}!="", SYMLINK+="$env{SYMLINK_BY_RES}", GOTO="have_symlink"
ENV{SYMLINK}!="", OPTIONS+="string_escape=none", SYMLINK="$env{SYMLINK}", GOTO="have_symlink"

# Legacy rules for older DRBD 8.3 & 8.4 when drbdadm sh-udev did not yet export SYMLINK
ENV{DISK}!="", SYMLINK+="drbd/by-disk/$env{DISK}"
ENV{RESOURCE}!="", SYMLINK+="drbd/by-res/$env{RESOURCE}"

LABEL="have_symlink"

ENV{DEVICE}=="drbd_?*", SYMLINK+="$env{DEVICE}"

LABEL="drbd_end"

引用自:https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/428640